n8n is genuinely good developer-grade automation, so this is not a rip-out. The gap is the human layer: approvals, hand-offs, and people you can hold accountable. n8n exports clean JSON, but that is an n8n definition, not a Tallyfy import. Keep n8n for the system work, add Tallyfy for the people, and let n8n call it by webhook.
Zapier is fine for moving data between apps, but some of your Zaps quietly grew into human workflows with approvals and hand-offs. There is no portable Zap export, so this is a re-think, not a data move. Lift the people-work into Tallyfy and leave the plumbing where it is.
Pega is a model-driven case-management and decisioning platform, and most of it has no equivalent in Tallyfy. Its applications package as RAP archives built to move between Pega environments, not out to another vendor. So this is a re-author of one slice: the human approval workflows that never needed the platform.
Appian is a low-code platform for building enterprise apps, and most of what it does has no home in Tallyfy. Its export is an application package built to move between Appian environments, not out to another vendor. So this is a re-author migration of one thing: the human approval workflows.
Most teams leaving Rocketlane only ever used the onboarding workflow and the customer portal, not the full PSA suite they paid for. This guide covers what the Rocketlane API can and cannot pull out, how projects, phases, and tasks map to Tallyfy, and which billing and resource features stay behind.
Leaving Airtable starts with one question, and it is not how to export. It is whether each base is a workflow or a genuine dataset. Only the workflow bases belong in a process tool. Here is what Airtable export really carries, how the concepts map to Tallyfy, and a realistic week-by-week plan.
ServiceNow runs your whole IT service operation, and you should not try to move all of it to Tallyfy. The honest play is narrow: lift the few human approval and request workflows that never needed the heavy platform, and keep ServiceNow for everything else.
Monday.com is a flexible Work OS with thirty-plus column types and a stack of views. Tallyfy is one sequential workflow. Migrating means deciding which boards are really repeatable processes, auditing your column types, and rebuilding recipes as rules. Here is what Monday export gives you, the full concept map, and a realistic week-by-week plan.
Camunda is a developer-grade BPMN engine, and its export is genuinely clean: models are BPMN 2.0 XML you can download. The real work is sorting which diagrams are human workflows for Tallyfy from the system orchestration Tallyfy is not built to run. Here is the concept map and the export reality.
Moving from Trainual to Tallyfy is not really a migration, it is a re-author. Trainual documents how the work is done; Tallyfy runs it and tracks that it happened. This guide covers what the PDF export and the API can and cannot do, how each documented procedure maps to a runnable blueprint, and which content to leave behind.
Kissflow is an all-in-one low-code platform with Processes, Boards, Apps, and Datasets. Tallyfy is a focused sequential workflow tool. Migrating means collapsing those module types into blueprints, exporting each module on its own, and being honest that the low-code app breadth does not come along. Here is the concept map, the export reality, and a realistic timeline.
The first question when leaving Smartsheet is not how to export, it is whether each sheet is a process or a spreadsheet. Only the process-shaped ones belong in a workflow tool. Here is what Smartsheet export actually gives you, how the concepts map to Tallyfy, and a realistic week-by-week plan.
Moving from Google Forms to Tallyfy is less about the data than about what happens after someone submits. A response just sits in a sheet until a person acts on it. This guide covers what the CSV, Sheets, and Forms API exports include, how each form concept maps to a Tallyfy blueprint, and why file uploads arrive as Drive links.
Leaving Confluence is not really a data migration. Confluence is a wiki, and the pages worth moving are the how-to and SOP pages that should be running as processes, not sitting as prose nobody follows. Here is what Confluence export gives you, how a page maps to a Tallyfy template, and a realistic re-authoring plan.
Make is great at moving data between apps, but a few of your scenarios quietly grew into human workflows, with approvals and people waiting. You can export a scenario as a Blueprint JSON, yet it imports nowhere useful, so this is a rebuild. Lift the people-work into Tallyfy and keep the plumbing.
Leaving Asana for Tallyfy is not really a data-export problem. It is a shape change: Asana flexible, multi-view projects become one sequential workflow that runs the same way every time. This guide covers what Asana CSV export actually includes, how each concept maps to a Tallyfy blueprint, and a realistic timeline measured in weeks, not a weekend.
Leaving Jotform for Tallyfy is not a data problem, it is a change of job. Jotform builds standalone forms; Tallyfy runs the process a form should start. This guide covers what Jotform Excel, CSV, and PDF exports actually include, how each form concept maps to a Tallyfy blueprint, and the one thing, payment, that stays in Jotform.
The first move when leaving Notion is not exporting, it is deciding which databases are real processes and which are just docs. Only the process databases belong in a workflow tool. Here is what Notion export actually carries, how the concepts map to Tallyfy, and a realistic week-by-week plan.
Moving from Typeform to Tallyfy is less about exporting data and more about what happens after someone hits submit. A Typeform response is a dead end until a person acts on it. This guide covers what Typeform CSV and the Responses API actually export, how each form concept maps to a Tallyfy blueprint, and a realistic week-per-form timeline.
Pipefy runs your work as cards moving across Kanban phases. Tallyfy runs it as a sequence that enforces its own order. Moving over means exploding each phase into real steps, rebuilding automations as rules, and deciding what to do about Pipefy database tables. Here is what export gives you, the full concept map, and an honest timeline.
Trello is a lightweight Kanban board. Tallyfy is a sequential workflow that runs the same way every time. Migrating means turning columns into steps, rebuilding Butler rules, and accepting that dragging a card is no longer the whole system. Here is what Trello export gives you, the full concept map, and an honest week-by-week plan.
Nintex is a sprawling suite: process mapping, workflow automation, K2, RPA, and document generation. Tallyfy runs sequential human workflows. Migrating means picking the forms-and-approvals subset, re-authoring it instead of lifting it, and accepting that RPA and DocGen do not come along. Here is the concept map, the export reality, and a realistic timeline.
Most teams leaving Wrike are not escaping a bad tool, they are escaping its weight: custom item types, request forms, and deep folder trees built for enterprise project management. Tallyfy runs one process at a time. Here is what Wrike export gives you, how the concepts map, and a realistic week-by-week plan.
This is the rare migration that is genuinely smooth. Process Street and Tallyfy share the same checklist-and-workflow model, so most of your setup comes across nearly unchanged. Here is what Process Street export gives you, how the concepts map almost one to one, and the one feature that needs a real plan.